Answer: There is an increased need for simultaneous HCP detection and identification to improve HCP risk assessment.
This can be achieved using antibody-dependent methods such as the ELISA, in combination with orthogonal LC-MS analyses. The ELISA remains the Gold Standard for HCP monitoring, however LC-MS can provide complementary information. The ELISA is easy to implement, suitable for high-throughput measurements and accepted for the quantification of HCP residues by regulatory agencies for the approval of drug release. LC-MS analyses can be used as an additional method to validate the HCP ELISA performance for a specific manufacturing process, while enabling the identification of single HCPs to assess their individual safety risk. In the following the strengths and drawbacks of each method are specified:
HCP-ELISA | LC-MS | |
Strengths |
|
|
Drawbacks |
|
|
Considering all strengths and drawbacks of both, HCP-ELISA and LC-MS methods, optimal HCP moitoring is achieved by combining their advantages:
- Antibody-based methods and MS-only techniques rely on completely different methodological approaches and thus provide true orthogonality
- The combination of both methods enables a solid HCP monitoring strategy based on ELISA technology including quantification and identification of relevant HCPs
- Optimal risk assessment together with high-sensitive HCP detection: supports the drug safety profile, increases chances for successful Market Authorization Application (MAA) and benefits patient safety
Do you want to discuss HCP monitoring and the advantages of orthogonal methods in further detail with one of our experts? Let's make an appointment.